Heading

Case Number: TC09532
Location: Decided on the papers
Appeal reference: TC/2022/13037
VALUE ADDED TAX – Appellant providing fresh information to HMRC at same time as filing appeal to Tribunal – HMRC changing position in light of that fresh information, and parties settling dispute – Appellant withdrawing Tribunal appeal – Appellant making application to Tribunal for costs 18 months after withdrawal – whether the Appellant should be granted an extension of time to make costs application – no
Judgment date: 9 May 2025
Decided by:
TRIBUNAL JUDGE BAILEY
Between
BLINDSPOT GLOBAL LIMITED
Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Respondents
The Tribunal determined the application for costs without a hearing having first read the Appellant’s application for costs, consisting of a series of emails from 9 October 2024 onwards, the Respondents’ opposition to that application, and the parties’ correspondence (with enclosures) with the Tribunal from 21 August 2024 onwards.
DECISION
- Heading
- Introduction
- Outcome
- Background facts
- The Appellant’s dispute with HMRC
- The Appellant’s appeal to the Tribunal
- The Appellant’s complaints to HMRC
- The Appellant’s costs application to the Tribunal
- The requirements of Tribunal Rule 10
- The lateness of the application
- Whether the Respondents acted unreasonably
- Conclusions
![TC09532 - [2025] UKFTT 00568 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)