Ordinary meaning
Ordinary meaning
Applying the ordinary meaning of the language, Item 5 exempts the supply (provision) of a person appointed to represent or act on behalf of another (deputy) where that other is a person registered in the register of medical practitioners. On a purely linguistic analysis of the words chosen by Parliament, Item 5 exempts the supply of a person of a defined type and not a supply of the services which that person is appointed to undertake. It is not limited to the provision of a deputy for a general practitioner when providing out of hours cover because the language used provides no such limitation.
We therefore agree entirely with the Tribunal in Rapid that, on its ordinary meaning, Item 5 exempts the supply of registered medical practitioners in any field of medicine so long as the role performed by the individual so supplied is one that requires it to be performed by a registered medical practitioner.
That conclusion, in light of Mainpay, indicates that Item 5 is ultra vires the provisions of the Sixth Directive and the PVD as it exempts a supply of staff and not the supply of medical care.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Appellant’s standing in the appeal/supply issue
- Appellant’s witness statements
- Exhibits not on Appellant’s list of documents and other documents
- The forbidden part and Hansard extracts
- Relevant law
- Healthcare legislation
- The issues
- Approach to the interpretation of Item 5
- HMRC’s submissions
- Discussion
- Ordinary meaning
- Statutory and historical context
- Mischief rule
- Barras principle
- Conforming interpretation
- HMRC’s alternative arguments
- Sample transactions
- On framework
- Off framework
- HMRC’s challenges to the documents
- Findings of fact
- Application of Item 5 to established facts
- Conclusions
![TC09640 - [2025] UKFTT 01114 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)