INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
This decision deals with issues arising from a final closure notice issued by HMRC to the appellant on 11 December 2020 (“the closure notice”). The closure notice amended the appellant’s tax return for the tax year 2010/2011, by removing a capital loss of £300,000 on which share loss relief had been claimed and added further income tax due to HMRC of £146,848.82.
The appellant notified an appeal against the closure notice to the tribunal, on 24 July 2024.
It is HMRC’s position that this is a very late appeal and I should deny the appellant permission to bring his appeal so very late.
It is the appellant’s primary position that the appeal is not late, as he had requested a statutory review within an extended time period granted to him by an HMRC officer, and since HMRC have never provided him with the requisite notification, time was still running in the appellant’s favour when he brought his appeal on 24 July 2024.
In the alternative, if no such valid review was requested, then I should grant permission as an evaluation of all the circumstances of the case weighs heavily in the appellant’s favour.
For the reasons given later in this decision, I have concluded that the appeal was late, and that I should reject the appellant’s application for permission to bring his appeal late.
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE LAW
- THE EVIDENCE AND THE FACTS
- DISCUSSION
- Submissions - not late
- My view - not late
- Late appeal
- He accepted that the delay in notifying the appeal to the tribunal is serious and significant
- Mr Finerty thought that he had made a valid request for a statutory review in the Valentine’s Day letter Secondly, the appellant reasonably relied on BP. He was under the mistaken impression that Mr Finerty had responded to HMRC’s letter of 8 March 2
- The merits of the parties respective positions did not militate strongly one way or the other
- The appellant’s delay is at worst 586 days and best 62 days. These are both serious and significant
- The merits of the appellant’s underlying case are weak My view
- DECISION
- RIGHT TO APPLY FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
- An appeal may be brought against–
- In relation to an appeal under section 31(1) (a) or (c) of this Act –
- In relation to an appeal under section 31(1) (b) of this Act –
- (4A) In relation to an appeal under section 31(1)(d) against a simple assessment—
- HMRC must, within the relevant period, notify the appellant of HMRC's view of the matter in question HMRC must review the matter in question in accordance with section 49E
- 49C— HMRC offer review Subsections (2) to (6) apply if HMRC notify the appellant of an offer to review the matter in question
- Subsections (2) and (3) do not apply in a case where—
- The nature and extent of the review are to be such as appear appropriate to HMRC in the circumstances
- The review may conclude that HMRC's view of the matter in question is to be—
- Conclusions
![TC09594 - [2025] UKFTT 00893 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)