![TC09600 - [2025] UKFTT 00919 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png){kind=logo}
Ms Griffith’s health
Ms Griffith’s health
In 2019, 2020 and 2022 Ms Griffiths had time off work for medical investigations into a serious illness. Mr Milhill did not obtain any temporary cover during those periods. Again, he has not specified the periods when Ms Griffiths was off work; how those dates related to the deadlines for filing his appeals; why Haines Watts did not do so on his behalf or why a late appeal application was not filed when Ms Griffiths returned to work. We find that Ms Griffiths’ absence was not a cause of the delays in failing to file his appeals by the due dates.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The matters before the Tribunal
- The evidence
- Mr Milhill’s business and the addresses
- Late filing penalties
- The 2014-15 tax year
- The 2015-16 tax year
- The subsequent correspondence and assessments
- The appeals and applications, and the bankruptcy petition
- Mr Milhill’s mental health
- Mr Milhill’s physical health
- Ms Griffith’s health
- ISSUE 1: WHETHER MR MILHILL WAS NOTIFIED
- The Law
- The legislation under which the decisions were made
- The Interpretation Act
- The UT judgment in Websons
- Application to this case
- Decisions issued after 3 July 2020
- Decisions copied to Mr Milhill on 9 July 2020
- Decisions sent to Ms Griffiths
- ISSUE 2: WHETHER TO GIVE PERMISSION
- The time limits
- The Case Law
- The length of the delays
- Serious and/or significant?
- Mr Milhill’s health?
- Conclusions