Prejudice to Mr Gill
Prejudice to Mr Gill
If Mr Gill’s reinstatement application does not succeed, the PLN will become final, and he will owe HMRC £1,825,818.08. He is also likely to face bankruptcy, as he told Officer King would be the position. Those are, however, the inevitable consequences of a person with few or no assets losing the opportunity to challenge an HMRC decision at the Tribunal, and I accord them little weight.
Mr Gill has serious physical health conditions and suffers from anxiety and depression. It is reasonable to assume that his health will worsen if the PLN becomes final as the result of losing this application. I accord that factor some weight.
- Heading
- Introduction and summary
- The Evidence
- Evidence about the role played by Mr Monk/TMS
- Mr Gill’s evidence
- Ms Gill
- Findings of fact
- Mr Gill’s business and the assessments
- Mr Gill’s health, the Tribunal’s directions and the failures to comply
- The first postponed hearing
- The second postponed hearing
- Pre-hearing correspondence
- TMS’s lack of response
- Mr Gill’s failure to attend
- Factors to consider
- Reasons for not adjourning the hearing
- Late application to reinstate
- The case law
- The first Martland stage
- Mr Gill’s health
- Reliance on TMS
- Case law on reliance on advisers
- Application to Mr Gill’s case
- The need for time limits to be respected
- Reliance on advisers
- Prejudice to Mr Gill
- Prejudice to HMRC
- Merits
- Other Tribunal users
- Conclusions
![TC09602 - [2025] UKFTT 00930 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)