The end-clients
The end-clients
The Appellant’s clients include Wembley National Stadium (“the FA”), the All-England Lawn Tennis Club (“Wimbledon”), Tottenham Hotspur Football & Athletic Co. (“Spurs”), Chelsea Football Club (“Chelsea”), Fulham Football Club (“Fulham”), London Stadium 185 (Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park), Laing O’Rourke (“Tideway”), and several other minor clients. By way of example, the ‘service’ provided by the Appellant is set out in the following terms (“the Fulham contract”):
“BETWEEN:
FULHAM FOOTBALL CLUBLimited, a company registered in England … (the "Fulham"); and
TYLER SECURITYLimited, a company registered in England under number 6412278 and VAT Registered whose registered office is at 23 Copthorne Avenue... (the "Service Provider");
…
SEARCH DOG OPERATIVES” mean those appropriately qualified individuals engaged by the Service provider to provide the Services;”
“SERVICES means the provision by the Service Provider of Search Dog Operatives at the locations in accordance with this Agreement and as further described in Schedule 1.”
Invoices, with the fee calculated on the number of “dog teams” (i.e., a combination of dog and handler), are provided by the Appellant to the end-client. An example of one such invoice is to “BMB JV” is as follows:
“Supply of one Narcotics Search Dog & Handler at £240
BMB JV West Site
…
Task Order No. 3 of 10 13 February 2020”
Given the trading patterns of its clients, the Appellant neither maintains a workforce, nor owns or maintains its detection dogs or transport. The Appellant became an Approved Contractor Scheme (“ACS”) with the Security Industry Authority (“SIA” (Footnote: 4)) in March 2014. The Appellant subcontracts its dog detection services to specialist businesses.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The issue
- Burden and standard of proof
- Authorities and documents
- Background facts
- Dramatis personae
- The end-clients
- The dog-handlers
- HMRC’s investigation
- The Determination
- Relevant law
- ITEPA
- The PAYE Regulations
- TMA
- The evidence and the key submissions
- The Appellant’s submissions
- HMRC’s submissions
- Findings of fact
- Discussion
- Whether the Agency legislation applies
- Condition 1: s 44(1)(a)
- An individual (‘the worker’)
- ‘ Personally provided services ’
- Supervision, Direction and Control
- Conclusions
![TC09663 - [2025] UKFTT 01250 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)