Juristeca
Juristeca País
    Case No. EWHC-932-(IPEC)
    Intellectual Property Enterprise Court

    Case No. EWHC-932-(IPEC)

    Fecha: 26-Abr-2017

    Whether overheads should be apportioned by reference to the entire business

    68.Abbott argued that apportioning overheads by reference to the entire business was bound to create anomalies unless the entire business in question is homogeneous. But Abbott did not identify a simple and fairer alternative and I cannot see that there is one.
    • HIS HONOUR JUDGE HACON
    • Defendants
    • Introduction
    • The background facts
    • Profits due to Abbott on Design & Display’s sale of panels
    • The law
    • The first remitted issue: What proportion of sales of slatted panel sold together with infringing inserts should be included in the account of profits?
    • Deductible overheads
    • Second remitted issue: what deductions (if any) for general overheads may Design & Display make?
    • Level of overheads
    • Level of sales
    • Whether overheads should be apportioned by reference to the entire business
    • Whether apportionment should be by reference to revenue or volume
    • Payments to directors
    • Rent
    • Delivery charges
    • Conclusion

    Otros enlaces de interés:

    Jurisprudencia clasificada por bienes e inmuebles Jurisprudencia clasificada por contravención de las normas jurídicas Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos de la unión europea Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos fundamentales Jurisprudencia clasificada por materias del derecho Jurisprudencia clasificada por profesiones Jurisprudencia clasificada por sector agrario Jurisprudencia clasificada por sectores de la sociedad

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca