question 2
121.Would it have been obvious to the skilled person at the priority date, knowing that the Tap Bank achieves substantially the same result as the invention, that it does so in substantially the same way as the invention? 122.No separate argument was made by Teleste in relation to the second question. I find that the answer is yes.
Improver
- Introduction
- Technical Background
- The witnesses
- The skilled person
- The Patent
- The normal construction of claim 1
- Validity
- Inventive step
- Infringement
- Base unit with an input for a signal from a cable network
- The group of signal outputs
- Conclusion
- Improver
- question 1
- question 2
- question 3
- Amendment
- Conclusion