The issues
5.Three issues were identified before the trial: (1)Whether FBT owns the Copyright. (2)Whether LTEV and Plastic Head were licensed under the Copyright. (3)If there was no licence, whether Plastic Head knew or had reason to believe that the vinyl copies of Infinite which it sold, and the CD copies which it imported and sold, were infringing copies of the sound recording of Infinite. 6.In closing Mr Colbey did not pursue the second issue. He maintained his case that FBT did not own the Copyright but accepted that if it did, no licence to the defendants had been granted.