Acquiescence and estoppel
17.18.Are the Defendants entitled to a defence of estoppel or acquiescence in respect of any acts that would otherwise be acts of passing off? 19.Are the Defendants entitled to a defence of estoppel or acquiescence in respect of any acts that would otherwise be acts of infringement of the Mark?
- David Stone (sitting as Deputy High Court Judge) :
- Signs
- Domain Name
- Device
- CE Sign
- List of Issues
- Goodwill and Reputation
- Partnership; Separation; Consent
- Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off
- Authorisation
- Acquiescence and estoppel
- Validity of the Mark
- Revocation of the Mark
- Witnesses
- Copyright
- Flaming O Device
- Did the Claimant own protectable goodwill in 2003?
- www.cormeton.co.uk
- Is the Mark invalid or liable for revocation?
- Has the First Defendant infringed the Mark?
- First Defendant’s Goods/Services
- Identical Good/Services
- Passing Off
- Estoppel/Acquiescence
- Summary