Conclusion
117.The Patent is invalid. Had it been valid, claim 1 would have been infringed, claim 45 would not have been infringed.
- HIS HONOUR JUDGE HACON
- December 2021.
- Introduction
- The Witnesses
- The technical background
- The Skilled Person
- The Patent
- Construction
- Infringement
- The law
- Validity of claims 1 and 45 – Anderson
- Validity of claim 1 – Waisel
- Validity of claim 45 – Waisel
- table referred to as PEFIOS.
- Validity of claim 45 – the Tehrani Paper and US 268
- Insufficiency
- Conclusion