Conclusion
21.It follows that in the present case, first, I have no jurisdiction to consider the Claimant’s application for leave to appeal. Secondly, even if I had such jurisdiction, the time for filing an appellant’s notice has now expired and an application to extend time retrospectively may be made only to the Court of Appeal.
- Introduction
- The rule
- The Claimant’s arguments on the Covid Protocol
- Create Financial
- McDonald v Rose
- In the case of a formal hand down where counsel have been excused from attendance that can be done by applying in writing prior to the hearing.
- Jackson v Marina Homes
- As long as the decision hearing has been formally adjourned, any such application can be treated as having been made ‘at’ it for the purpose of CPR r 52.3(2)(a).
- LisleMainwaring
- also
- Hysaj
- Conclusion