Consent
The Law
109.The leading judgment of the CJEU on implied consent to the use of a trade mark is Zino Davidoff SA v A&G Imports Ltd (Joined Cases C-414/99, C-415/99 and C-416/99) EU:C:2001:617. The Court was dealing with a referred question about the exhaustion of rights in relation to goods placed on the market in the EEA and thus primarily art.7 of Directive 89/104/EEC. The equivalent of art.7 is s.12 of the 1994 Act, as amended by The Intellectual Property (Exhaustion of Rights) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019. Neither art.7 nor s.12 is concerned with service marks.110.The Defendants in the present case rely instead on the absence of consent as an essential ingredient of infringement, see s.9 of the 1994 Act:“
- HIS HONOUR JUDGE HACON
- Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and released to BAILII. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 10.30 a.m. on Tuesday 25th January 2022.
- Introduction
- Background Facts
- The Witnesses
- The Issues
- Trade Mark Infringement – section 10(2)
- Trade Mark Infringement – section 10(3)
- Passing Off
- Further defences
- Consent
- Rights conferred by registered trade mark
- Estoppel
- Conclusion
