The Amendment Application
14.The draft amendments allege that Domino’s decision to withdraw the Masters from digital release and no longer to make them available digitally breaches the 2001 Agreement. The amendments focus on the construction and scope of Domino’s release obligations under the 2001 Agreement and on the consequences of the alleged breach of those obligations. Permission is also sought to add an alternative claim relating to alleged restraint of trade. If permitted, the draft amendments would add significant new claims to the existing proceedings.15.It was agreed that if the Amendment Application succeeded the trial would have to be vacated. Domino has stated that, in those circumstances, its position would be that the action, including any amended claims, should be transferred into the Chancery Division. Mr Carter stated on instruction that Mr Hebden could afford to continue the litigation only if it remained in IPEC.
- Introduction
- Procedural history
- The applications
- The SJ Application
- Jameel v Dow Jones and Co
- The Amendment Application
- Conduct of the hearing
- Relevant factual background
- Term
- RELEASE COMMITMENT
- The legal test for permission to amend
- Quah Su-Ling v Goldman Sachs International
- The proposed amendments for which permission is sought
- Express or implied duty to exploit/duty of good faith
- Proposed reliance on clauses 4.3 and 4.4 of 2001 Agreement
- Submissions / assessment
- Express or implied duty to exploit/duty of good faith – inconsistency of pleadings – submissions
- Express or implied duty to exploit/duty of good faith – inconsistency of pleadings – assessment
- Express or implied duty to exploit/duty of good faith – substance – submissions
- Panayiotou
- Nichols
- Schroeder
- John v James
- Yam Seng Pte Ltd v International Trade Corp Ltd
- Express or implied duty to exploit/duty of good faith – assessment
- Express or implied duty to exploit/duty of good faith – consequences of breach – submissions
- Copinger and Skone-James on Copyright
- Crosstown Music Co LLC v Rive Droite Music Ltd & ors
- Crosstown
- Express or implied duty to exploit/duty of good faith – consequences of breach – assessment
- Sullivan
