Case No. IP-2021-000046
Intellectual Property Enterprise Court

Case No. IP-2021-000046

Fecha: 27-Feb-2023

Damage

154.The Defendants submit that C has been unable to show any damage by use of D1’s 2015 Trade Marks from June 2014, but the point is the same as made previously. For the purposes of section 5(4)(a) TMA I am concerned with notional and fair use of the registered marks, and I am satisfied that is different, and would be significantly more substantial, than the very limited use made by WCS in the UK of D1’s ICE Word Mark and D1’s ICE Logo prior to their registration. There does not need to be any actual damage as this can be made out on a quia timet basis. It seems to me that given the very significant goodwill I have found in C’s ICE Sign and C’s ICE Logo built up over many years, and the misrepresentation that I have found would likely arise if notional and fair use of D1’s 2015 Trade Marks was made, the likelihood of damage to C would inevitably flow from that.