Conclusion
69.Having considered all the circumstances in the light of the procedural context in IPEC and the overriding objective, I will not grant the order sought.70.Contrary to the Claimants’ submissions, this does not negate the granting of the interim payment order. The Claimants have a right which can be enforced through the court system as with other money judgments; this would not have been possible before that order was made. Any issues and evidence relevant to enforcement can be considered most appropriately in that context. 71.If in future other orders are not complied with, the just result may be an ‘unless’ order. In this instance, however, the just order from a case management perspective, bearing in mind the relevant policy issues and the overriding objective, is to dismiss the Claimants’ application.