Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
Claim No: IP-2022-000076 - [2024] EWHC 88 (IPEC)
Fecha: 24-Ene-2024
THE DEFENCE
THE DEFENCE
Aldi’s position is that it accepts that it used the Thatchers Product as a ‘benchmark’ when developing the Aldi Product, but denies infringement of the Trade Mark. If the Court finds that the requirements for section 10(2)(b) or 10(3) infringement are made out, Aldi relies on the defence provided by section 11(2)(b) of the Act. In relation to passing off, Aldi’s case is that none of the requirements of passing off are established. I note for convenience here that Aldi makes no counterclaim in invalidity of the Trade Mark.
- Heading
- Her Honour Judge Melissa Clarke
- Section 2
- THE CLAIM
- What is the sign complained of?
- THE DEFENCE
- THE LIST OF ISSUES
- WITNESSES
- FACTUAL BACKGROUND
- The Thatchers Product
- The Trade Mark
- Marketing and sales of the Thatchers Product
- Aldi and the Taurus range of ciders
- “Benchmarking”
- Use of the Sign
- Sales achieved by the Aldi Product
- LAW
- Section 10(2) (b) TMA infringement
- Section 10(3) infringement
- Passing off
- ISSUES
- Scope of assessment
- Further submissions on similarity
- Determination
- Conclusions