Judge Hacon
Judge Hacon :
Introduction
The claimant (‘Prevayl’) is the owner of UK Patent GB 2 589 947 (‘the Patent’). It relates to a type of bra which incorporates technology that measures biosignals produced by the wearer, sometimes called a ‘smart bra’. (A biosignal is any signal emitted by a living being which can be measured and monitored.) For instance, electrodes can be used to measure the heart’s electrical activity during exercise, which may be informative of the health and fitness of the wearer.
Prevayl alleges that the defendant (‘Whoop’) has infringed the Patent. Whoop counterclaims, seeking a declaration that the Patent is invalid due to lack of novelty or inventive step over the cited prior art.
- Heading
- Judge Hacon
- The skilled team
- The experts
- The Patent
- The prior art
- US 845
- Novelty
- Inventive step – claim 1
- Inventive step – claim 2
- PCT 853
- Infringement – the issues
- The law on indirect infringement
- Means relating to an essential element
- Knowledge and intention
- Means suitable for putting the invention into effect
- Summary of the law under s.60(2)
- Infringement – this case
- Conclusions
![IP-2022-000067 - [2025] EWHC 399 (IPEC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AacSvIO.png)