A clamp in Soble instead of a flexible cap
A clamp in Soble instead of a flexible cap
Well Lead argued that a clamp was required in Soble because when it was undone it allowed the withdrawal of the scope to be sufficiently free of friction.
Soble is clear that other known means can be used to seal off the proximal opening of the sheath against the enclosed scope aside from a clamp, among them a rubber band. It was an agreed part of the CGK that flexible caps were commonly used to achieve a seal between a sheath and a scope by the time of the priority date. CJ Medical argued that using a flexible cap instead of a clamp would have been seen by the skilled person as an obvious alternative. That was Professor Somani’s view, which I find persuasive.
- Heading
- Judge Hacon
- The skilled person
- The expert witnesses
- Technical Background
- The Patent
- The claims
- Construction
- Claim 3 – a flexible, deflectable tip
- The prior art
- Soble and Russo
- The law on inventive step
- Inventive step over Soble
- Differences between claim 1 and Soble
- Sleeve v sheath
- No obturator in Soble
- A clamp in Soble instead of a flexible cap
- Conclusion on Soble and inventive step
- Wan
- Piercing stylus, obturator and trocar
- Inventive step of claim 1 over Wan
- Inventive step of claim 3 over Wan
- Added matter
- Method of treatment or diagnosis
- Infringement
- Normal construction
- Sizes 10-13 as equivalents
- Conclusions
![IP-2024-000024 - [2025] EWHC 492 (IPEC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AacSvIO.png)