Juristeca
Juristeca País
    QB-2022-000681 - [2025] EWHC 2744 (KB)
    King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court

    QB-2022-000681 - [2025] EWHC 2744 (KB)

    Fecha: 27-Oct-2025

    (Emphasis added )

    (Emphasis added)

    As noted earlier, the validity of the extension of the PdV was the primary reason why experts in Cameroonian law were to be instructed by the parties. I will discuss later in the judgment the parties’ positions in respect of the significance of the withdrawal by the Defendants of paragraph 44.3(i).

    • Heading
    • I will refer to this Order as the “ Stacey J Order ”
    • (A)​ The Applications
    • The claim
    • (Emphasis added )
    • (C)​ The Stacey J. Judgment
    • The judgment of Morris J and his consequential costs order
    • CPR 3.1(7)
    • Discussion and decision
    • Discussion and decision
    • Should an unless order be made requiring payment of the outstanding security for costs?
    • Conclusions

    Otros enlaces de interés:

    Jurisprudencia clasificada por bienes e inmuebles Jurisprudencia clasificada por contravención de las normas jurídicas Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos de la unión europea Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos fundamentales Jurisprudencia clasificada por materias del derecho Jurisprudencia clasificada por profesiones Jurisprudencia clasificada por sector agrario Jurisprudencia clasificada por sectores de la sociedad

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca