King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
KB-2023-003483 - [2025] EWHC 1799 (KB)
Fecha: 14-Jul-2025
Overall conclusion with respect of the CPR 38.6 presumption
Overall conclusion with respect of the CPR 38.6 presumption
For all these reasons, the Claimants have not shown a good reason for displacing the presumption in CPR 38.6. Accordingly, the Claimants, as parties who have discontinued their claims, are liable for D3’s costs incurred on or before the date on which the Notice of Discontinuance was served on them, namely 2 May 2025. It follows that I do not consider it appropriate to accede to the Claimants’ request that I order D3 to pay the Claimants’ costs, or make no order for costs.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The legal framework
- The factual background
- The procedural history
- Issue, service and acknowledgement of the claim and the Claimants’ Part 18 application
- Events between 14 May 2024 and 11 December 2024, including the Claimants’ s.13 application
- The 12 December 2024 hearing and events thereafter
- The Notice of Discontinuance and events thereafter
- (i): D3’s provision of information to the Claimants
- (ii): D3’s deletion of the allegedly defamatory posts at the request of the Claimants
- (iii): The merits of the Claimants’ claim against D3
- (iv): Alleged unreasonable conduct by D3
- Overall conclusion with respect of the CPR 38.6 presumption
- Summary assessment
- Conclusion in respect of CPR 38.6
- Consequential matters
- A payment on account of costs and time for making any such payment
- Conclusions