King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court
KB-2025-001016 - [2025] EWHC 2023 (KB)
Fecha: 31-Jul-2025
Relief
Relief
In my judgment, it would be appropriate to grant declaratory relief in this case which sets out the Court’s finding as to the proper interpretation of Dr MN’s contract of employment with respect to the identity of the Case Manager for this investigation. That relief will make it clear to the parties what the contractual requirements are, including the qualifications identified at paragraphs 109-110 above. I leave it to the parties to seek to agree the precise wording of that declaratory relief having read this judgment (which will initially be provided to them in draft for the purposes of typographical corrections). If no agreement can be reached, the Court will determine the matter.
- Heading
- Section 1
- Factual Background
- Witness evidence at the trial
- MHPS
- The Trust’s Documents
- The legal framework
- The parties’ submissions
- Discussion
- Issue 4: whether appointing Ms Y as Case Manager or authorising her to continue as Case Manager is a breach of the implied terms of the employment contract
- Issue 5: If the Investigation Report identifies concerns which relate to Dr MN’s conduct and/or capability, is the Trust required to implement the procedures set out in the E27 Policy at Section 3 and
- Relief
- Conclusions