KB-2025-002427 - [2025] EWHC 1993 (KB)
Fecha: 31-Jul-2025
Heading
Mr Jonathan Glasson KC sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge Approved Judgment | Hattons of London Ltd v Knightsbridge Collection Ltd & Ors |

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Before:
MR JONATHAN GLASSON KC
SITTING AS A DEPUTY JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
Between:
HATTONS OF LONDON LTD | Claimant |
- and – (1) THE KNIGHTSBRIDGE COLLECTION LIMITED | |
Defendants |
Mr Daniel Northall KC (instructed by Herrington Carmichael LLP) for the Claimant
Mr Andrew Pickerill (the Second Defendant) appeared in person
Mr Nicholas Cobill (instructed by Knights Solicitors) for the Fourth Defendant
Mr Ghazan Mahmood (instructed by Lexadeen Solicitors) for the Fifth Defendant
Mr William Shore (the Sixth Defendant) appeared in person
The First, Third, Seventh and Eighth Defendants did not appear and were not represented
Hearing date: 17 July 2025
Approved Judgment
This judgment was handed down remotely at 10.30 a.m. on 31st July 2025 by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.
MR JONATHAN GLASSON KC:
This is my judgment on an application made by Hattons of London Ltd (“the Claimant”) for an interim prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the Defendants arising from an alleged “breach of contract, inducement of breach and unlawful means conspiracy and breach of confidentiality”.
The First Defendant (“D1”) was incorporated in October 2024, and its business model and practice are said to rely heavily (if not exclusively) on using the proprietary information and confidential information of the Claimant. D1’s sole registered director and shareholder is D8. At the start of the hearing, I was told that D8 had applied to liquidate the company.
The individual Defendants are all former employees of the Claimant. In the case of the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Defendants (“D2”, “D3”, “D4”, “D5”, “D6”, “D7”), they are recent former employees employed as Account Managers. The Eighth Defendant (“D8”) was employed as an Account Manager until October 2022.
- Heading
- The application for an adjournment
- The hearing before me
- The Claimant’s evidence
- The Defendants’ responses and evidence
- The parties’ submissions at and for the hearing
- The application for an injunction
- The requirement for service of Affidavits
- Discussion and decision
- Springboard relief
- Discussion and decision
- Imaging order
- Discussion and decision
- Conclusions