![HT-2022-000180 - [2024] EWHC 1088 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_yJUntHA.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
XVI Final remarks
The Court is grateful to all Counsel for the quality and clarity of their written and oral submissions. The parties are asked to agree an order to reflect this judgment.
- Heading
- I Introduction
- II The Applications
- III The position of Sweett
- IV The history of the pleadings and the strike out application
- V The law
- VI The Pantelli argument
- VII Fire safety defects
- VIII Roofs
- IX En Suite Doors
- X Vanity units
- XI The various appendices to Sweett’s skeleton argument
- XII Conclusion
- XIII The four points referred to at para. 22 above
- XIV Alleged inconsistency between cases advanced in the Sweett and MAAP proceedings
- XV Application to amend
- Conclusions