![HT-2022-000132 - [2025] EWHC 1058 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_yJUntHA.png){kind=logo}
Heading
Rolls Building
Fetter Lane
London, EC4A 1NL
Before :
MRS JUSTICE JEFFORD DBE
Between :
(1) THE NEW LOTTERY COMPANY LIMITED (2) NORTHERN AND SHELL PLC | Claimants |
- and - | |
THE GAMBLING COMMISSION -and- (1) ALLWYN ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED (2) ALLWYN INTERNATIONAL AG (formerly known as ALLWYN INTERNATIONAL AS) (3) CAMELOT UK LOTTERIES LIMITED | Defendant Interested Parties |
Sa’ad Hossain KC and Azeem Suterwalla KC (instructed by Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner) for the Claimants
Sarah Hannaford KC, Tamara Oppenheimer KC and Barney McCay (instructed by Hogan Lovells) for the Defendant
Joseph Barrett KC (instructed by Quinn Emanuel) for the Interested Parties
Hearing dates: 7 March 2025
Approved Judgment
This judgment was handed down remotely at 10.30am on Tuesday 6th May 2025 by circulation to the parties or their representatives by e-mail and by release to the National Archives.
.............................
MRS JUSTICE JEFFORD
Mrs Justice Jefford:
- Heading
- Background
- Disclosure
- The parties’ disclosure exercises
- Legal principles: privilege
- Inadvertent disclosure of privileged material
- Specific issues relevant to the review in this case
- The subjective review
- The relevance of Quinn Emanuel’s review
- The 20 groups of Use Pursued Documents
- Documents which did not appear obviously privileged
- Line 15
- Line 16
- Line 20
- Line 22
- Lines 24, 25 and 26
- Line 12
- Documents where there is an identifiable Lawyer recipient/ Commentator but not obvious that the content is legal advice
- Line 14
- Redacted documents which had already been reviewed for privilege, and no obvious reason to question it
- Line 19
- Documents where redaction was inconsistent
- Documents in which the content is potentially legal advice or reflects the substance of legal advice, but it was considered these were deliberately disclosed as answering to D35
- Conclusions