[2024] UKUT 87 (AAC)

The Appellant argued, in summary, that none of the available evidence showed that O had either met the outcomes in his EHC Plan, or more generally that he no longer required educational provision. The evidence all supported the contrary view. The Local Authority accepted that educational provision was still required but were seeking either to place the responsibility on a College to meet O’s needs, or for Social Services to do so, despite this not being their roles.