Why I have determined the appeal, and Father’s applications, without a hearing
Why I have determined the appeal, and Father’s applications, without a hearing
In their responses, both the SoS and Mother asked the Upper Tribunal to determine the appeal without holding a hearing. Father, in his email of 3 February, asked that a hearing be held.
It seems to me fair and just to determine the appeal, as well as Father’s applications, without a hearing: all three parties had the opportunity to make written submissions, through the process set out in case management directions; there was nothing in those written materials that required clarification or further explanation, to enable me to determine matters fairly and justly; and so holding a hearing would gave caused unnecessary delay.
- Heading
- The decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error in point of law as respects the Crows Nest variation (as explained in the Reasons section below). However, the error was not mat
- The appeal to, and decision of, the FTT
- The grant of limited permission to appeal by the Upper Tribunal
- The SoS’s response to the appeal
- Mother’s response to the appeal
- Father’s applications
- Why I have determined the appeal, and Father’s applications, without a hearing
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 162 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)