DBS’s submissions on evidence
DBS’s submissions on evidence
Ms Hartley argued that it was extremely implausible that AR’s account of sexual intimacy between him and HA (as recorded in the ‘investigatory interview’ with AR on 25 July 2022) had been fabricated by HA’s employer; it was much more likely that AR had given the account attributed to him. Ms Hartley submitted that the account is not suggestive of someone who was “out of touch” with reality: CJ at one point repeats AR’s evidence back to him, and AR corrected certain details; ER’s evidence also suggested that AR was able to recall things accurately; and HA’s own evidence was that he had had a conversation with AR about AR’s experience as a young man.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the Respondent made on 16 February 2023 (DBS reference DBS6191 00982365420 ) to include HA in the adults’ barred list is co
- DBS’s decision
- Jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal
- Documentary evidence in the Upper Tribunal bundle
- The Upper Tribunal hearing
- HA’s evidence and arguments – summary
- DBS’s submissions on evidence
- Discussion
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 277 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)