[2024] UKUT 224 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2024] UKUT 224 (AAC)

Fecha: 01-Jul-2024

What this case is about

What this case is about

5.

The Appellant agrees that it would be wrong for a nursing auxiliary to insert their fingers into a patient’s vagina with a view to relieving constipation, and he doesn’t dispute that doing that would amount to ‘relevant conduct’ in relation to vulnerable adults or indeed to children.

6.

However, the Appellant says he did no such thing, and the DBS was mistaken when it found that he had. He says his name should be removed from both the Adults’ Barred List and the Children’s Barred List so that he can continue his career as an auxiliary nurse.