[2024] UKUT 318 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2024] UKUT 318 (AAC)

Fecha: 30-Jul-2024

Documentary evidence in the Upper Tribunal bundle

Documentary evidence in the Upper Tribunal bundle

9.

In addition to DBS’s decision letter, evidence in the bundle of 145 pages included:

a.

two one-page notes of meetings held on 10 January 2022 with two support workers at the home where RR worked, about concerns raised by them about RR’s performance

b.

2-page note of employer’s meeting with RR on 10 January 2022

c.

4-page document of RR’s employer dated 12 January 2022, authorising RR’s suspension

d.

7-page note of a probation review meeting on 17 January 2022 attended by RR and two representatives of his employer

e.

RR’s email to his employer dated 17 January 2022

f.

dismissal letter from RR’s employer, dated 18 January 2022

g.

a DBS referral form from RR’s employer dated 4 February 2022 which, amongst other things, described RR’s work as ‘support worker’ and his employer as ‘learning disability support provider’; and showed that RR worked there from 21 November 2021 to 17 January 2022 (when he was dismissed) – just under two months; it said that service user JP had complex learning disabilities, physical support needs and health support

h.

1-page statement by RR, dated 7 July 2022, and an undated 3 page letter from RR to the “Madam Helen”

i.

2-page letter from RR to DBS dated 5 October 2022

j.

DBS’s “barring decision summary” document: amongst other things, this recorded “definite concerns” under the heading “irresponsible and reckless”; and “some concerns” under “callousness/lack of empathy” and under “poor problem solving/coping skills”.