The First-tier Tribunal’s decision on the overpayment appeal
The First-tier Tribunal’s decision on the overpayment appeal
On 29 August 2023 a different FTT dismissed the Appellant’s appeal against the overpayment decision. This FTT’s decision notice recorded that “There has been an overpayment of the Housing Cost Element of Universal Credit for a spare bedroom. This was confirmed by a tribunal decision of 3 May 2023 … This resulted in an overpayment of £105.60 for the assessment period 23.07.22 to 22.09.22. Whilst the appellant has objected to this amount being set off against the underpayment of the child element of £290, the respondent is within his right to do so and only pay the balance of £184.40 to her.”
The second FTT’s statement of reasons correctly explained that any overpayment of Universal Credit was recoverable from a claimant, regardless of fault (see section 71ZB of the Social Security Administration Act 1992). It added that there was no right of appeal against the DWP’s decision to recover an overpayment, but only with respect to the amount of the overpayment. To that extent the FTT’s decision on the appeal against the overpayment decision stood or fell with the outcome of the appeal against the entitlement decision.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow both appeals. The decisions of the First-tier Tribunal made on 3 May 2023 under file number SC246/22/01293 and on 29 August 2023 under file number SC246/
- Introduction
- Why this is important
- The context of the present appeal
- The DWP’s decisions in this case
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision on the entitlement appeal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision on the overpayment appeal
- The Appellant’s appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- The legislation governing non-dependants in the Universal Credit scheme
- The relevant case law on the meaning of “non-dependant”
- Discussion
- Disposal
- Postscript: the DWP’s own guidance
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 261 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)