Section 1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal be ALLOWED and the case be REMITTED for a further hearing by a traffic commissioner selected by the Senior Traffic Commissioner.
SUBJECT MATTER: Refusal of adjournment; revocation of licence for maintenance failings; proportionality; disqualification
CASES REFERRED TO: Ladd v. Marshall [1954] 1 W.L.R. 1489; R. v. Hereford Magistrates’ Court (ex parte Rowlands) [1998] Q.B. 110; Bryan Haulage Limited (No. 2) 217/2002; Priority Freight Limited and Williams 2009/225; Bradley Fold Travel Limited and Peter Wright v. Secretary of State for Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 695, [2011] R.T.R. 13; David Finch Haulage [2010] UKUT 284 (AAC); Fergal Hughes and Perry McKee Homes Limited v. Department of the Environment in Northern Ireland [2013] UKUT 0618 (AAC); Redsky Wholesalers Ltd. T-2013-07; VST Building & Maintenance Limited [2014] UKUT 0101 (AAC); LA and Z Leonida t/a ETS [2014] UKUT 0423 (AAC); Randolph Transport Limited and Catherine Tottenham [2014] UKUT 460 (AAC)
REASONS FOR DECISION
Preliminary
This is an appeal by the First Appellant, Hard Concrete Limited (“the Company”) and the Second Appellant, Jatinder Singh Dhillon (“Mr. Dhillon”), its sole director, against the decision of the Deputy Traffic Commissioner for the South Eastern and Metropolitan Area (“the TC”) given on 4th July 2024, following a public inquiry held on 24th June 2024. By his decision the TC:
Revoked the Company’s operating licences OK2012880 and OH2017026;
Refused the Company’s application for licence OF2067675;
Disqualified Mr. Dhillon from holding or obtaining an operator’s licence in any capacity for a period of six months.
The revocation and disqualification were expressed to take effect from 5th August 2024. The Company and Mr. Dhillon applied for a stay, which was refused by the TC on 7th August 2024.
In the meantime, on 2nd August 2024, Mr. Dhillon had filed a notice of appeal against the TC’s decision by which he sought to challenge the whole of the decision. A renewed application for a stay was made to the Upper Tribunal and was granted by Judge Rupert Jones on 8th August 2024. Case management directions were given by Judge Mitchell on 18th September 2024.
The Company and Mr. Dhillon were represented at the hearing before us by Mr. Finnegan of counsel. We are grateful to him for his clear and helpful submissions.
- Heading
- Section 1
- The facts
- The public inquiry
- The TC’s decision
- The initial grounds of appeal and the application for a stay
- The legal context
- 2013-07 that the Bryan Haulage and Priority Freight questions might appropriately be asked in relation to the revocation of a restricted licence. The Tribunal put the position as follows
- The Appellants’ submissions
- Failure to grant an adjournment
- The revocation decisions were disproportionate
- The TC failed to give adequate weight to the positives
- The disqualification decision was disproportionate
- Refusal of the application for licence OF2067675
- Points arising at the hearing
- Discussion
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 071 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)