![[2025] UKUT 353 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Conclusions
Conclusion
For those reasons, I conclude that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal was made in error of law but that the construction of the relevant provisions which has been adopted by the DWP in the appellant’s case is the correct construction. I therefore set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal and substitute my own decision. My decision is that the appellant’s entitlement to pension was correctly calculated in the sum of £323.35 with effect from 20th June 2022, made up as set out in the DWP submission dated 9th August 2024 to the First-tier Tribunal.
E. Ovey
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Authorised by the Judge for issue on 13th October 2025
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error on a point of law. That decision is set aside and a decision to the same effect is su
- Introduction
- Factual background
- Legal framework
- The arguments before the First-tier Tribunal
- The First-tier Tribunal’s decision
- The grounds of appeal and the parties’ submissions
- Analysis
- Conclusions