[2025] UKUT 118 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2025] UKUT 118 (AAC)

Fecha: 19-Feb-2025

Heading

IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER

Appeal No. UA-2024-000840-V

[2025] UKUT 118 (AAC)

On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service

Between:

Alfred Forzong

Appellant

- v -

The Disclosure and Barring Service

Respondent

Before: Judge Sarah Johnston, Sitting as a Judge of the Upper Tribunal, Josephine Heggie Specialist Member and Rachael Smith Specialist Member

Hearing date: 19 February 2025

Decision date: 31 March 2025

Representation:

Appellant: represented himself

Respondent: Mr Toby Fisher Matrix instructed by the DBS

ANONYMITY ORDER

On 6 September 2024, the Upper Tribunal made the following order, which remains in force—

“3. Having considered the provisions of Rule 14(1)(b) of the 2008 Rules and the reasons given by the Respondent in the 25 July 2024 letter, I order prohibiting publication of any matter or disclosure of any documents likely to lead members of the public directly or indirectly to identify the following persons.

a. [the client for whom the appellant was caring]

b. [the son of that client].

4. Any breach of the order at paragraph [3] above is liable to be treated as a contempt of court and punished accordingly (section 25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007).”.

We have used ciphers for both in the decision—

a. The client for whom the appellant was caring is named as ES

b. ES’s son is named as HC.

DECISION