![[2025] UKUT 228 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
Oral evidence at the hearing
Oral evidence at the hearing
VMAC gave evidence. He also called two additional witnesses at the hearing, JD, a family friend, and LC, who was his former line manager at AC, and had also been his line manager at AT, the company VMAC worked for before joining AC.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to ALLOW the appeal and REMIT the matter to the Disclosure and Barring Service for a new decision
- A summary of the factual background
- The Barring Decision
- Appeal grounds
- The Upper Tribunal substantive oral hearing
- The legal framework for Barring Decisions
- Oral evidence at the hearing
- VMAC’s evidence
- Evidence from JD
- Evidence from LC
- Submissions from the parties
- Our analysis
- The wording used in the Barring Decision Process summary (and in turn, in the Minded to Bar and Final Decision Letters)
- Was there a mistake of fact and / or was there a mistake or mistakes of law?
- Was any mistake of fact one on which the Barring Decision was based and was any mistake of law material?
- Conclusions