Case No. UKUT-00515-(IAC)

[2015] UKUT 260 (IAC), at [19]–[33] and, in particular, the conclusion enshrined in [32] : “ T o put the matter shortly, it appears to us that a person’s immigration status is ‘precarious’ if their continued presence in the UK will be dependent upon their obtaining a further grant of leave. It is precisely because such a person has no indefinite right to be in the country that the relationships they form ought to be considered in the light of the potential need to leave the country should that g ran t of leave not be forthcoming ” Judges and practitioners should be constantly alert to this clear and concise formulation of the principle of “precariousness” . More recently, in