R v Director of Public Prosecutions, ex Parte Kebeline
[2000] 2 AC 326, at 371 per Lord Steyn. This is further illustrated in the rejection of judicial review challenges to aspects of inquest proceedings pursued at a stage when the process is not complete. See in particular
- Direction Regarding Anonymity – Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
- Introduction
- The Issue
- The Proceedings to Date
- Statutory Framework
- “Right of appeal to the Tribunal
- “Pending appeal
- Section 11
- “Right to appeal to Upper Tribunal
- “Proceedings on appeal to Upper Tribunal
- “Right to appeal to Court of Appeal etc.
- “Overriding objective and parties’ obligation to co-operate with the Upper Tribunal
- “Case management powers
- The Parties’ Contentions In Outline
- Discussion
- A right of appeal is conferred by statute or equivalent legislative authority; it is not a mere matter of practice or procedure and neither the superior nor the inferior Court or Tribunal nor both combined can create or take away such a right.
- Evans v Bartlam
- Re D (A Child)
- R v Z
- R (Quintavalle) v the Secretary of State for Health
- Brown v Dean
- R v Pinfold
- Hewitson v Hewitson
- R v Director of Public Prosecutions, ex Parte Kebeline
- McLuckie v Coroner for Northern Ireland
- further
- partial
- Conclusion