AA v SSHD
[2006] UKAIT 00061, the AIT had to consider a risk said to arise not because of individual circumstances of the particular appellant but because of the belonging to or perception of belonging to a particular class of persons. The AIT held that in such circumstances, the appellant needs to show “only that there is a consistent pattern of such mistreatment such that anyone returning in those circumstances faces a real risk of coming to harm even though not everyone does”. That approach was upheld by the Court of Appeal in
- Introduction
- Background
- Approach to this case
- and applicable legal framework
- HJ (Iran) v SSHD
- AA v SSHD
- (Iran)
- Horvath
- DK v SSHD
- Hearing
- Country background evidence
- http://stats.gov.lc/subjects/society/crime
- no island actively pursues criminal investigations for breaking these laws
- Conclusion
- Decision
- Direction Regarding Anonymity – Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
