Case No. UKUT-00241-(IAC)
Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber

Case No. UKUT-00241-(IAC)

Fecha: 14-Mar-2018

[2006] UKAIT 00016

should no longer be followed? (iii) Are draft evaders who have been imprisoned under Article 336 of the Ukrainian criminal code required thereafter to undertake military service during periods of mobilisation ? If so what are the conditions to which they will be exposed during such military service? 7. At the hearing however it was agreed by both parties and the Panel that it is only possible to address the first two issues with a view to providing country guidance and that there was simply insufficient country of origin material available to make any informed guidance decision on the third issues as to whether those conscripted or mobilised into the Ukrainian army were at real risk of being required to commit acts contrary to international humanitarian law or whether they would be at real risk of persons such as the appellants being subject to " dedovshchina ", which means violent bullying or initiation within the army, which might in turn put those recruited or mobilised at risk of serious harm. 16. In her Grounds Ms Norman submitted that the judge erred in law in regarding VB as being authoritative on the IHL point, and in failing to assess the further evidence provided relating to breaches of IHL. At the ‘error of law’ hearing, an d in written submissions received from the parties following the ‘error of law’ hearing, Ms Norman developed her second ground. She contends that the relevant law provides as follows: A person is a refugee if he faces non-optional recruitment, or penalty for refusal, to a military which is committing acts, with which he may be associated, contrary to international humanitarian law. 17. In her submission t he mere fact that there is ‘non-optional recruitment’ or a ‘ penalty ’ for re f using conscription , regardless of the nature or seriousness of the penalty , would entitled a person to refugee status if he would, as a result of conscription, face a real risk of being associated with acts contr ary to basic rules of human conduct . In support of her submission Ms Norman relies on