ppeals brought
under section 82(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to be treated as abandoned where an appellant was issued with documentation confirming a right to reside in the United Kingdom under EU law. Following the changes to the 2002 Act brought about by the Immigration Act 2014 that abandonment provision was revoked and never replaced.
ii.
There has never been provision under any of the EEA Regulations for an appeal against an EEA decision brought under those Regulations to be treated as abandoned following a grant of leave to remain or the issuance of specified documentation confirming a right to reside in the United Kingdom under EU law.
iii.
It follows that a grant of leave to remain following an application under the EU Settlement Scheme does not result in an appeal against an EEA decision brought under the 2016 EEA Regulations being treated as abandoned.
DECISION AND REASONS
Introduction
1. Must an appeal brought under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (SI 2016/1052 - “the 2016 Regulations”) against an EEA decision be treated as abandoned following a grant of leave to remain to the appellant? 2. The position originally adopted by the Respondent in answer to this question was “yes”. However, she now concedes that this is not the case and that there has never been a legislative mechanism for an appeal brought
- Introduction
- Relevant background
- matters
- section 82(1)
- under section 82(1)
- Appeals under the 2002 Act
- shall have no right of appeal under
- or section 82(1) of the 2002 Act. Any existing appeal under those sections of those Acts or under the Asylum and Immigration Appeals Act 1993, the Asylum and Immigration Act 1996 or the 1999 Act shall be treated as abandoned
- Appeals brought under the 2000 Regulations
- Munday (EEA decision: grounds of appeal)
- ppeals brought
- under the 2016 Regulations
- under those Regulations
- and remaking the decision
- Anonymity
- We remake the decision by allowing the appeal.
