Nimo (appeals: duty of disclosure)
[2020] UKUT 88 (IAC); [2020] Imm AR 894.33.The duty of candour in judicial review proceedings is well established by authority, however. That duty applies in the Upper Tribunal, in precisely the same way as in the Administrative Court. A respondent is under a ‘very high duty … to assist the court with full and accurate explanations of all the facts relevant to the issue the court must decide’:
- J U D G M E N T
- Judge Blundell:
- Relevant Background
- XX (PJAK - sur place activities - Facebook) Iran
- R (HB) v Derby City Council
- R (LS) v London Borough of Brent
- Submissions
- Smithkline Beecham Plc v Generics (UK) Ltd
- Nimo (appeals: duty of disclosure)
- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v Quark Fishing Ltd
- R v Lancashire County Council ex parte Huddleston
- Cocks v Thanet District Council
- Quark Fishing
- explain
- R (Citizens UK) v SSHD
- R (JS) v SSHD
- R (A) v London Borough of Croydon
- R (CJ) v Cardiff City Council
- R (Al-Sweady) v Secretary of State for Defence
- Analysis
- R (DL) v Newham Borough Council
- (R (Houreau & Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
- R (Gardner & Anor) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care & Ors
- Tweed v Parades Commission
- Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2)
- XX (PJAK – Facebook) Iran
- Kerr v Department for Social Development
- R (HAM) v London Borough of Brent