[2023] UKUT 00164 (IAC)

Ms Ahmed acknowledged that ground 4 is contingent upon ground 3. She conceded that if we dismiss the respondent’s appeal on Article 3 grounds, the challenge based upon the contention that the FTT erred in law in concluding that there would be very significant obstacles to the appellant’s integration to Zimbabwe falls away. Ms Ahmed was correct to make such a sensible and practical concession.

It follows that we do not accept that there was any material error of law as alleged in ground 4.