Heading

Hani (EUSS durable partners: para. (aaa))
Promulgated on 21 February 2024
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE STEPHEN SMITH
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JARVIS
Between
Sherif Hani
(NO ANONYMITY DIRECTION MADE)
Appellant
and
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellant: Mr P. Georget, Counsel instructed by Malik and Malik Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr P. Deller, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
(1) The effect of paragraph (b)(ii)(bb)(aaa) of the definition of “durable partner” in Annex 1 of Appendix EU to the Immigration Rules, as inserted by Statement of Changes HC 813 (from 31 December 2020 to 11 April 2023), is that a person who was in a durable partnership but did not have a “relevant document”, and who did not otherwise have a lawful basis of stay in the United Kingdom at the “specified date” of 31 December 2020 at 11.00PM, is incapable of meeting the definition of “durable partner”.
(2) Nothing in the amendment to paragraph (aaa) made by HC 1160 with effect from 12 April 2023 calls for a different approach.
(3) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Kabir UI-2022-002538 did not seek to give guidance about para. (aaa) and does not establish any proposition to be followed.
(4) A “lawful basis of stay” under para. (aaa) does not include residence in the United Kingdom on immigration bail.
DECISION AND REASONS
- Heading
- In this decision, we address
- Factual background
- Principal controversial issues
- THE FIRST ISSUE
- Decisions of the Upper Tribunal: Basha, Drini and Kabir
- Para. (aaa): requirement for relevant document where no other lawful basis of stay
- Statement of Changes to the Immigration Rules HC 1160
- Conclusion: para. (aaa)
- THE SECOND ISSUE
- Legal framework
- Immigration bail not a “lawful basis of stay” for the purposes of para. (aaa)
- Conclusion : para. (aaa) applied to the appellant’s case
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 00068 (IAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AioYBzS.png)