[2025] UKUT 00150 (IAC)
Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber

[2025] UKUT 00150 (IAC)

Fecha: 08-Nov-2024

As the underlying claim made by the second appellant concerns a claim for international protection, pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the second appellant is g

As the underlying claim made by the second appellant concerns a claim for international protection, pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the second appellant is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the second appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the second appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court.

The Issue

1.

These two appeals are unconnected but have been listed before us because they raise an important issue. There is a culture that has developed in statutory appeals of unfocused and poorly formulated grounds of appeal with excessive prolixity and complexity that impacts a proper consideration of the grounds when an application for permission to appeal is considered. This sometimes leads to a grant of permission to appeal on limited grounds, which, when properly considered at a hearing, are difficult to disentangle from grounds upon which permission was refused. That in turn causes unnecessary confusion when the appeal is heard regarding the scope of the appeal.

2.

In each of the appeals, in this decision we simply address the scope of the appeal before the Upper Tribunal and having done so, the appeals will be listed separately for the Tribunal to consider whether the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (“FtT”) is infected by a material error of law, and if so, the appropriate course for the disposal of the appeal. We will not trespass upon the substantive merits of either appeal in this decision.