Ground four – Article 8
Ground four – Article 8
There was no dispute between the parties that this final ground of appeal stood or fell with the two grounds already considered above and that if there was an error of law in one or other of them, this ground would also succeed as the reasoning for allowing the appeal on human rights grounds was entirely dependent on the EUSS findings. For these reasons, we find an error of law on this final ground and the decision must be set aside on this ground as well.
- Heading
- Section 1
- Immigration history
- Decision to refuse the Appellant’s human rights claim
- Decision to refuse the Appellant’s EUSS application
- First-tier Tribunal decision
- The appeal
- Findings and reasons
- Ground three – findings as to ‘persistent offender’ and as to the seriousness of offences
- Ground four – Article 8
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 00393 (IAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AioYBzS.png)