[2025] UKUT 00091 (IAC)

Nothing turned on the decisions’ reliance on the substantive requirements of Appendix ROB without citing the specific paragraphs, in the circumstances of this case;

Para. ROB 8.6(a) was not met;

The Secretary of State was not confined to para. 8.6(a);

It is nothing to the point that by the time of the application under Appendix ROB Serena UAE was the majority shareholder;

The Secretary of State was entitled to ascribe significance to the preponderance of documents addressed to the second appellant, rather than the first, in light of his role with Serena UAE;

It was not irrational for the Secretary of State to ascribe significance to the second applicant’s role in Serena Euro, in light of all remaining factors;

Nothing in the remaining documents before the Secretary of State demonstrates that her approach was irrational.