Conclusions
Notice of Decision
The Judge erred materially for the reasons identified. We set aside the decision pursuant to Section 12(2)(a) of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCE 2007) and considered retaining the matter in the Upper Tribunal for remaking under section 12(2)(b)(ii) of the TCE 2007. However, we find there was a procedural error in that the judge, exceeding his powers in considering the human rights appeal, also failed to consider the matter on the EUSS decisions (although we note that the second refusal under the EUSS on 16th January 2024 was on the basis that a deportation order had been made). The judge is obliged to make a decision on the appeals before him. We thus remit this matter to the FtT.
In the light of our observations above, and this is not a decision on whether the notices of application will be accepted, it is now open to the appellant to submit with immediate effect
formal notices of appeal in relation to the two 16th January 2024 decisions
an application to extend time.
a request to have the appeals consolidated.
Helen Rimington
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber
31st July 2025
![[2025] UKUT 00317 (IAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AioYBzS.png)