Discussion
Discussion
There are two fundamental questions to be addressed in this appeal. The first is the correct approach in law to deciding whether an appellant such as MH qualifies for a derivative right of residence under the EUSS. The answer to this question will have a bearing on the second question: should we permit the respondent to withdraw the concession which was made at the First-tier Tribunal hearing which resulted in the appeal being allowed.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background
- Appeal to the First-tier Tribunal
- Appeal to the Upper Tribunal
- Discussion
- The derivative right of residence under the EUSS
- Analysis and Conclusions
- Withdrawal of a concession
- The caselaw on concessions
- Factors to be considered when an application is made to withdraw a concession
- Application of the Law to the Facts
- Unreasonably incurred costs
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 00351 (IAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AioYBzS.png)