Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber
Case No. UKUT-152-(LC)-UTLC-Case-Number:-LC-2021-240
Fecha: 19-May-2022
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
The following cases are referred to in this decision:Austin Rover Group Limited v HM Inspector of Factories [1990] 1 AC 619Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Fothringham LTS/ECC/2020/007Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2020] UKUT 282 (LC)Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc LTS/ECC/2019/0034EE Limited and Hutchison 3G UK Limited v Affinity Water Limited [2022] UKUT 8 (LC)EE Ltd and another v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Islington [2019] UKUT 53 (LC)EE Ltd and Hutchison 3G UK Ltd v R Morriss, DH Tayler and Pippingford Estate CoEE Limited v Stephenson [2021] UKUT 167O’May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [1983] 2 AC 726On Tower Limited v JH and FW Green Limited [2020] UKUT 348 (LC) (“Dale Park”)R v Associated Octel Co Limited [1994] 4 All ER 1051R v Tangerine Confectionery Limited and Veolia ES (UK) Limited [2011] EWCA Crim 2015Vodafone Ltd v Hanover Capital Ltd [2020] EW Misc 18 (CC)
- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
- Introduction
- The legal background
- The sites and the existing leases
- The disputed terms: general observations
- Responsibility for safety
- Terms relating to safety and access
- Sharing and upgrading
- Rights over the superior landlord’s land
- Further provisions relating to the superior landlord
- Miscellaneous provisions in the new leases
- provided that the proper and lawful use of the property in accordance with the terms of this lease for an in connection with the Permitted Use shall be deemed not to be a nuisance.”
- [2020] EW Misc 18 (CC)
- , despite the availability of transactional evidence
- £100 per annum
- Transaction costs
- Right of appeal