Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber
Case No. UKUT-0172-(LC)-UTLC-Case-Number:-LC-2020-33
Fecha: 01-Jun-2022
discretion
to modify.53. A lack of planning permission is not necessarily fatal to an application for modification, as demonstrated by the decision of the Tribunal (Mr P D McCrea FRICS) in Smith v Goodwin [2021] UKUT 145 (LC) where a conditional modification was granted. In this case, however, the structural concerns affecting Mrs Morton at No. 51 require specialist engineering input, for which a conditional modification would be inappropriate. I am therefore not prepared to exercise my discretion to modify the building restriction before scrutiny and determination through the planning process have taken place.54. If planning permission is obtained, the applicants will have the option of renewing their application to this Tribunal for modification. They will also have the option of engaging directly with the objectors, in particular Mrs Morton, to see whether the concerns underlying the objections have been satisfied by the permission and its conditions.Mrs Diane Martin MRICS FAAV Member, Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) 4 August 2022
- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
- Introduction
- The factual background
- The legal background
- Evidence for the applicant
- Ground (a): Are the restrictions obsolete?
- substantial
- Ground (c): Will the proposed modification cause injury to persons entitled to the benefit of the restrictions
- Determination
- jurisdiction
- discretion
- Right of appeal